CO129-162 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [1-3] — Page 230

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

226

of the 2014 November, regarding

Macau Coolie Trade.

2.

At the same time I beg to

transmit a copy of the Attorney

General's Report as to the powers of the

local Legislature in dealing with the same subject, and as to the existing state of the Law:

3.

These two documents express opinions in the most important

respect so diametrically opposite that, finding the Attorney General's

(with whose opinion I must express

concurrence) is

supported by the Law Officers of the Crown in England, I very naturally, though reluctantly, decline to act as Mr

Imale suggests.

Moreover, the decision

of the Chief Justice, to which he refers, is

under appeal to the Privy Council, and the portion of it

on which it is to be inferred that this Government ought to act, was not brought before the Supreme Court, but was

more

in the nature of an "obiter dictum", when deciding

on the Writ

of Habeas Corpus applied for in the

case of Kwok-a-

Sing.

Your Lordship's Department is

in full possession of all the details bearing

on the above case, and as

fresh instructions have been

issued for the guidance of the Governor

Edit History

2026-05-21 01:08:00 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
226 of the 2014 November, regarding Macau Coolie Trade. 2. At the same time I beg to transmit a copy of the Attorney General's Report as to the powers of the local Legislature in dealing with the same subject, and as to the existing state of the Law: 3. These two documents express opinions in the most important respect so diametrically opposite that, finding the Attorney General's (with whose opinion I must express concurrence) is supported by the Law Officers of the Crown in England, I very naturally, though reluctantly, decline to act as Mr Imale suggests. Moreover, the decision of the Chief Justice, to which he refers, is under appeal to the Privy Council, and the portion of it on which it is to be inferred that this Government ought to act, was not brought before the Supreme Court, but was more in the nature of an "obiter dictum", when deciding on the Writ of Habeas Corpus applied for in the case of Kwok-a- Sing. Your Lordship's Department is in full possession of all the details bearing on the above case, and as fresh instructions have been issued for the guidance of the Governor
Baseline (Original)
226 of the 2014 November, regarding Macau Coolie Trade. 2. the At the same time I beg to trament a copy of the Attorney General's Report as to the pavers of tudomes 2 the local Legislature in dealing with the same subject, and as to the existing state of the Law: 3. These two documents express opinions in the most important respect so diametrically opposite that, find the Attorney General' when I (with whose opinion I minst express any concurrence) is supported by the Law Officers of the Crown in "England, I very naturally, though reluctantly, decline to act as Mr 12 Imale suggests. Moreover, the decision the Decision of the is Chief Justice, to which he refers, under appeal to the Privy Carmail, and the portion of it on which it is to be inferred that this Gevement ought to act, was not brought before the Supreme loot, but was more in the nature of an "obiter dictum"," when deciding on the Writ of Mabeas Corpus applied for in the of Kwok-a- Sing. You Lordship's Department is in full possession of all the details bearing the above case, and as m. been fresh instructions have bur isued for the guidance of the Governor zv
2026-05-21 01:08:00 · Baseline
View content

226

of the 2014 November, regarding

Macau Coolie Trade.

2.

the

At the same time I beg to

trament a copy of the Attorney

General's Report as to the pavers of tudomes 2

the local Legislature in dealing with the same subject, and as to the existing state of the Law:

3.

These two documents express opinions in the most important

respect so diametrically opposite that, find the Attorney General'

when I

(with whose opinion I minst express

any

concurrence) is

supported by the Law Officers of the Crown in "England, I very naturally, though reluctantly, decline to act as Mr

12

Imale suggests.

Moreover, the decision

the Decision of the

is

Chief Justice, to which he refers, under appeal to the Privy Carmail, and the portion of it

on

which it

is to be inferred that this Gevement ought to act, was not brought before the Supreme loot, but was

more

in the nature of an "obiter dictum"," when deciding

on the Writ

of

Mabeas Corpus applied for in the

of Kwok-a-

Sing.

You Lordship's Department is

in full possession of all the details bearing

the above case, and as

m.

been

fresh instructions have bur isued

for the guidance of the Governor

zv

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.